Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 3222 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 12% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Celeron G1820 - 167 vs 149 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 20 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i5-13600K - $46.41 vs $283.99
- Up to 82% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i5-13600K - $0.31 vs $1.7 per FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600K - 53 vs 125 Watts
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
167
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.7/FPS
18%
Price, $
$283.99
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for $283.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 59 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
149
89%
Value, $/FPS
$0.31/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 59 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13600K | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 53 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |