Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3250 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12600KF is 3070 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3250.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12600KF
- Performs up to 9% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i3-3250 - 229 vs 211 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3250 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Up to 63% cheaper than Core i5-12600KF - $56.34 vs $152.66
- Up to 60% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i5-12600KF - $0.27 vs $0.67 per FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Core i5-12600KF - 55 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-12600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
229
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.67/FPS
40%
Price, $
$152.66
36%
FPS Winner
Buy for $152.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3212 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
FPS
211
92%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
100%
Price, $
$56.34
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $56.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3212 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-12600KF | vs | Intel Core i3-3250 |
---|---|---|
Nov 4th, 2021 | Release Date | Jun 9th, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 55 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |