Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12500 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12500 is 1827 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12500
- Performs up to 27% better in Valorant than Celeron G3930 - 888 vs 697 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 66% cheaper than Core i5-12500 - $63.92 vs $189.99
- Up to 57% better value when playing Valorant than Core i5-12500 - $0.09 vs $0.21 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i5-12500 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
888
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.21/FPS
42.857142857142854%
Price, $
$189.99
33%
FPS Winner
Buy for $189.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44037 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
697
78.490990990991%
Value, $/FPS
$0.09/FPS
100%
Price, $
$63.92
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $63.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44036 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
26.30895716140199%
Multi-Core
1043
11.48804934464148%
Intel Core i5-12500 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Alder Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |