Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-7700T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-7700T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12400F is 1827 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-7700T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400F
- Performs up to 16% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-7700T - 121 vs 104 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-7700T - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700T
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i5-12400F - $150.0 vs $899.99
- Up to 81% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-12400F - $1.44 vs $7.44 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-12400F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-12400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
121
100%
Value, $/FPS
$7.44/FPS
19%
Price, $
$899.99
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for $899.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17707 minutes ago
Buy for $150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17707 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-12400F | vs | Intel Core i7-7700T |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |