Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-11600KF on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-11600KF is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12400F is 294 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-11600KF.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400F
- Performs up to 0% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i5-11600KF - 314 vs 313 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i5-12400F - $165.86 vs $899.99
- Up to 82% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i5-12400F - $0.53 vs $2.87 per FPS
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
314
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.87/FPS
18%
Price, $
$899.99
18%
FPS Winner
Buy for $899.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6488 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
313
99%
Value, $/FPS
$0.53/FPS
100%
Price, $
$165.86
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $165.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6488 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-12400F | vs | Intel Core i5-11600KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |