Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600 and the cheaper Core i3-10105F have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 16% better in Rust than Core i3-10105F - 228 vs 197 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Up to 37% cheaper than Core i5-11600 - $87.98 vs $140.0
- Up to 26% better value when playing Rust than Core i5-11600 - $0.45 vs $0.61 per FPS
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $140 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 37 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
197
86%
Value, $/FPS
$0.45/FPS
100%
Price, $
$87.98
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $87.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 36 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600 | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |