Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400H outperforms FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11400H is 3179 days newer than FX-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400H
- Performs up to 15% better in Elden Ring than FX-4130 - 126 vs 110 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 45 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4130 - 12 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for $22.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1909 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Mobile • May 11th, 2021
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400H | vs | AMD FX-4130 |
---|---|---|
May 11th, 2021 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Tiger Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel BGA 1787 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
UHD Graphics | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |