Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11300H outperforms Xeon E3-1240 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11300H is 3164 days newer than Xeon E3-1240 v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11300H
- Performs up to 7% better in Fortnite than Xeon E3-1240 v2 - 230 vs 215 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i5-11300H
Mobile • Jan 11th, 2021
Xeon E3-1240 v2
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11300H | vs | Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 11th, 2021 | Release Date | May 14th, 2012 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E3 |
| Tiger Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel BGA 1449 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| Not Available | TDP | 69 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Iris XE 80EU | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
