Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8086K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-8086K is 695 days older than the cheaper Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i7-8086K - $101.85 vs $398.75
- Up to 74% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i7-8086K - $0.83 vs $3.22 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8086K
- Performs up to 2% better in Elden Ring than Core i5-10400F - 124 vs 122 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
122
98%
Value, $/FPS
$0.83/FPS
100%
Price, $
$101.85
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $101.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14040 minutes ago
Buy for $398.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14039 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jun 5th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | Intel Core i7-8086K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 5th, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 40th |
Comet Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |