Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400 is 2517 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3250.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Performs up to 5% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than Core i3-3250 - 217 vs 207 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3250 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Up to 61% cheaper than Core i5-10400 - $48.0 vs $123.59
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i5-10400 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $123.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74329 minutes ago
Buy for $48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74327 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Single-Core
532
37.20279720279721%
Multi-Core
1130
20.586627801056657%
Intel Core i5-10400 | vs | Intel Core i3-3250 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 9th, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |