Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms Core i5-10210U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 741 days older than Core i5-10210U.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10210U
- Consumes up to 92% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 15 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 1% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-10210U - 169 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10210U - 24 vs 8 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
169
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.6/FPS
100%
Price, $
$270
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $270 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 143 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Aug 21st, 2019
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10210U | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Aug 21st, 2019 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
1.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |