Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-9100T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-9100T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 234 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-9100T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100T
- Up to 66% cheaper than Core i7-9700F - $99.0 vs $289.0
- Up to 64% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-9700F - $0.77 vs $2.16 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 5% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-9100T - 134 vs 128 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100T - 8 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for $99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2 minutes ago
Buy for $289 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9100T | vs | Intel Core i7-9700F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |