Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-9100T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-9100T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700F is 1586 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-9100T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100T
- Up to 66% cheaper than Core i7-13700F - $99.0 vs $292.32
- Up to 54% better value when playing Rust than Core i7-13700F - $0.53 vs $1.15 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-13700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700F
- Performs up to 37% better in Rust than Core i3-9100T - 254 vs 186 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100T - 24 vs 4 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
FPS
186
73.22834645669292%
Value, $/FPS
$0.53/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2321 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
254
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.15/FPS
46.08695652173914%
Price, $
$292.32
33%
FPS Winner
Buy for $292.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2326 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Single-Core
1203
45.20856820744081%
Multi-Core
3178
20.536348949919226%
Intel Core i3-9100T | vs | Intel Core i7-13700F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |