Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-6300 outperforms the more expensive Core i3-9100T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-6300 is 1096 days older than the more expensive Core i3-9100T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100T
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i3-6300 - 35 vs 51 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6300
- Performs up to 1% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Core i3-9100T - 245 vs 243 FPS
- Up to 31% cheaper than Core i3-9100T - $68.02 vs $99.0
- Up to 32% better value when playing FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Core i3-9100T - $0.28 vs $0.41 per FPS
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
FPS
243
99.18367346938776%
Value, $/FPS
$0.41/FPS
68.29268292682927%
Price, $
$99
68%
Buy for $99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4899 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
245
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.28/FPS
100%
Price, $
$68.02
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $68.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4897 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9100T | vs | Intel Core i3-6300 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |