Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-9100F outperforms the more expensive Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-9100F is 2423 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 15% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i3-3220 - 203 vs 177 FPS
- Up to 28% cheaper than Core i3-3220 - $56.99 vs $79.0
- Up to 38% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i3-3220 - $0.28 vs $0.45 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i3-9100F - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
203
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.28/FPS
100%
Price, $
$56.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $56.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11113 minutes ago
Buy for $79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11112 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9100F | vs | Intel Core i3-3220 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |