Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-9100F is 600 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 2% better in The Last of Us Part I than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 135 vs 133 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 15% cheaper than Core i3-9100F - $109.99 vs $129.95
- Up to 14% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i3-9100F - $0.83 vs $0.96 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 16 vs 4 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
135
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.96/FPS
86%
Price, $
$129.95
84%
FPS Winner
Buy for $129.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 189 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
133
98%
Value, $/FPS
$0.83/FPS
100%
Price, $
$109.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $109.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 189 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9100F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |