Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8300 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-8300 is 897 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8300
- Performs up to 12% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Celeron G3900 - 172 vs 154 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 53% cheaper than Core i3-8300 - $70.0 vs $149.69
- Up to 48% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i3-8300 - $0.45 vs $0.87 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i3-8300 - 51 vs 62 Watts
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $149.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 46 minutes ago
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 46 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 14th, 2018
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-8300 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Feb 14th, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
62 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |