Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms Core i3-8130U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 807 days newer than Core i3-8130U.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8130U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900F - 15 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 84% better in League of Legends than Core i3-8130U - 206 vs 112 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8130U - 20 vs 4 threads
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
206
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.09/FPS
100%
Price, $
$225
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $225 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5721 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Feb 13th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-8130U | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Feb 13th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD 620 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |