Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8100 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-8100 is 275 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100
- Performs up to 7% better in F1 22 than Celeron G3930T - 272 vs 255 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 65% cheaper than Core i3-8100 - $39.0 vs $110.0
- Up to 62% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i3-8100 - $0.15 vs $0.4 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i3-8100 - 35 vs 65 Watts
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $110 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6000 minutes ago
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5999 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-8100 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |