Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7350K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 2192 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7350K.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7350K
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - $49.99 vs $435.0
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 10% better in Rocket League than Core i3-7350K - 793 vs 719 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7350K - 32 vs 4 threads
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Buy for $49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75903 minutes ago
Buy for $435 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75903 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1452
53.18681318681319%
Multi-Core
2873
16.68505720425112%
Intel Core i3-7350K | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
60 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
42.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |