Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7350K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-7350K is 1583 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7350K
- Performs up to 19% better in Minecraft than Core i3-3240T - 714 vs 600 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Up to 50% cheaper than Core i3-7350K - $25.7 vs $51.6
- Up to 43% better value when playing Minecraft than Core i3-7350K - $0.04 vs $0.07 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i3-7350K - 35 vs 60 Watts
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $51.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 177 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
600
84%
Value, $/FPS
$0.04/FPS
100%
Price, $
$25.7
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $25.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 177 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7350K | vs | Intel Core i3-3240T |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
60 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
42.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |