Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-7600 outperforms the more expensive Core i3-7300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-7600 and the more expensive Core i3-7300 have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7300
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i5-7600 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7600
- Performs up to 2% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-7300 - 187 vs 184 FPS
- Up to 23% cheaper than Core i3-7300 - $99.0 vs $129.0
- Up to 24% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-7300 - $0.53 vs $0.7 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $129 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1950 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
187
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.53/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1951 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7300 | vs | Intel Core i5-7600 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |