Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 3 3100 outperforms the more expensive Core i3-7300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 3 3100 is 1207 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-7300.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7300
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3100 - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3100
- Performs up to 3% better in Battlefield 2042 than Core i3-7300 - 163 vs 159 FPS
- Up to 26% cheaper than Core i3-7300 - $94.99 vs $129.0
- Up to 28% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Core i3-7300 - $0.58 vs $0.81 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7300 - 8 vs 4 threads
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $129 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2008 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
163
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.58/FPS
100%
Price, $
$94.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $94.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2009 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7300 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |