Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3100 outperforms the more expensive Core i3-7300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3100 is 1207 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-7300.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7300
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3100 - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3100
- Performs up to 1% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i3-7300 - 243 vs 240 FPS
- Up to 25% cheaper than Core i3-7300 - $74.24 vs $98.55
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7300 - 8 vs 4 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $98.55 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76024 minutes ago
Buy for $74.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76026 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1260
85.19269776876268%
Multi-Core
2502
49.24227514268845%
Intel Core i3-7300 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |