Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 1281 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7300.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7300
- Up to 74% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3900XT - $98.55 vs $379.0
- Up to 73% better value when playing Elden Ring than Ryzen 9 3900XT - $0.82 vs $3.03 per FPS
- Consumes up to 51% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT - 51 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 4% better in Elden Ring than Core i3-7300 - 125 vs 120 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7300 - 24 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
120
96%
Value, $/FPS
$0.82/FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.55
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $98.55 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 97 minutes ago
Buy for $379 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 98 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7300 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |