Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700KF is 2093 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7300.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7300
- Up to 59% cheaper than Core i7-13700KF - $129.0 vs $317.99
- Up to 54% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i7-13700KF - $0.64 vs $1.38 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700KF - 51 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-13700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700KF
- Performs up to 14% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i3-7300 - 230 vs 202 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7300 - 24 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $129 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8307 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
230
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.38/FPS
46%
Price, $
$317.99
40%
FPS Winner
Buy for $317.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8308 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7300 | vs | Intel Core i7-13700KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |