Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms Core i3-6320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 2690 days newer than Core i3-6320.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6320
- Consumes up to 66% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 51 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 13% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i3-6320 - 151 vs 134 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6320 - 32 vs 4 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-6320
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Core i9-13900KS
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-6320 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 24 |
| 4 | Threads | 32 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 150 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
