Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms Xeon E5-2680 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 3048 days newer than Xeon E5-2680 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 77% better in Far Cry 3 than Xeon E5-2680 v3 - 230 vs 130 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 - 32 vs 24 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3
- Consumes up to 20% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 120 vs 150 Watts
Far Cry 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-13900KS
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Xeon E5-2680 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900KS | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 12th, 2023 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Raptor Lake | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
24 | Cores | 12 |
32 | Threads | 24 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 150 W | TDP | 120 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
