Key Differences
In short — Core i3-6300 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220T on the selected game parameters. However, both CPUs are the same in terms of value. The better performing Core i3-6300 is 1093 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6300
- Performs up to 13% better in Alan Wake 2 than Core i3-3220T - 111 vs 98 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220T
- Up to 13% cheaper than Core i3-6300 - $59.4 vs $68.02
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i3-6300 - 35 vs 51 Watts
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $68.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 146 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
98
88.28828828828829%
Value, $/FPS
$0.61/FPS
100%
Price, $
$59.4
100%
Buy for $59.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 147 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
458
36.29160063391442%
Multi-Core
941
37.06183536825522%
Intel Core i3-6300 | vs | Intel Core i3-3220T |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Skylake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |