Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-560 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-560 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 3532 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-560.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-560
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $60.0 vs $225.0
- Up to 68% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-10900F - $0.52 vs $1.65 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 18% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-560 - 136 vs 115 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i3-560 - 65 vs 73 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-560 - 20 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for $60 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7453 minutes ago
Buy for $225 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7454 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Aug 29th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-560 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Aug 29th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Clarkdale | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
73 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |