Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 1818 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4350.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4350
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i7-9700F - $51.6 vs $295.0
- Up to 82% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i7-9700F - $0.39 vs $2.17 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700F - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 4% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i3-4350 - 136 vs 131 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4350 - 8 vs 4 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $51.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5427 minutes ago
Buy for $295 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5428 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4350 | vs | Intel Core i7-9700F |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |