Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10850K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10850K is 2279 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4350.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4350
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i9-10850K - $51.6 vs $286.0
- Up to 80% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i9-10850K - $0.42 vs $2.09 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i9-10850K - 54 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10850K
- Performs up to 11% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i3-4350 - 137 vs 123 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4350 - 20 vs 4 threads
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $51.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 184 minutes ago
Buy for $286 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 184 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4350 | vs | Intel Core i9-10850K |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |