Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 1197 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4350.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4350
- Up to 81% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - $51.6 vs $270.0
- Up to 80% better value when playing Escape From Tarkov than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - $0.26 vs $1.33 per FPS
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 54 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 3% better in Escape From Tarkov than Core i3-4350 - 203 vs 197 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4350 - 24 vs 4 threads
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $51.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5285 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
203
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.33/FPS
19%
Price, $
$270
19%
FPS Winner
Buy for $270 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5287 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4350 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |