Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4150T outperforms the cheaper Core i7-4930K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-4930K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-4150T is 242 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-4930K.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150T
- Performs up to 6% better in Starfield than Core i7-4930K - 50 vs 47 FPS
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Core i7-4930K - 35 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-4930K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4930K
- Up to 55% cheaper than Core i3-4150T - $100.0 vs $219.95
- Up to 52% better value when playing Starfield than Core i3-4150T - $2.13 vs $4.4 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150T - 12 vs 4 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $219.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 112 minutes ago
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 112 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4150T | vs | Intel Core i7-4930K |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Ivy Bridge E |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 130 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |