Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1650 v4 outperforms Core i3-4005U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is 1020 days newer than Core i3-4005U.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4005U
- Consumes up to 89% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 15 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Performs up to 22% better in Starfield than Core i3-4005U - 55 vs 45 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4005U - 12 vs 4 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
55
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.49/FPS
100%
Price, $
$81.79
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $81.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 152 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Sep 4th, 2013
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4005U | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Haswell | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 140 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |