Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2620 v3 outperforms Core i3-4000M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2620 v3 is 369 days newer than Core i3-4000M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4000M
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 37 vs 85 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
- Performs up to 3% better in Far Cry 5 than Core i3-4000M - 196 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4000M - 12 vs 4 threads
Far Cry 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-4000M
Mobile • Sep 4th, 2013
Xeon E5-2620 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4000M | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 4th, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Haswell | Codename | Haswell-E |
| Intel Socket G3 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
37 W | TDP | 85 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
