Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U outperforms Core i3-4000M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U is 1952 days newer than Core i3-4000M.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
- Performs up to 3% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i3-4000M - 162 vs 157 FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i3-4000M - 15 vs 37 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4000M - 8 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-4000M
Mobile • Sep 4th, 2013
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4000M | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 4th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Haswell | Codename | Raven Ridge |
| Intel Socket G3 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 37 W | TDP | 15 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
