Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7920X outperforms Core i3-4000M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-7920X is 1467 days newer than Core i3-4000M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4000M
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than Intel Core i9-7920X - 37 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Performs up to 4% better in Fortnite than Core i3-4000M - 225 vs 216 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4000M - 24 vs 4 threads
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
FPS
225
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.43/FPS
100%
Price, $
$547.2
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $547.2 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 138 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Sep 4th, 2013
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4000M | vs | Intel Core i9-7920X |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 10th, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket G3 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
37 W | TDP | 140 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |