Key Differences
In short — Core i7-920 outperforms Core i3-380M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-920 is 708 days older than Core i3-380M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-380M
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Core i7-920 - 35 vs 130 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-920
- Performs up to 0% better in World of Tanks than Core i3-380M - 503 vs 501 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-380M - 8 vs 4 threads
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
FPS
503
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.18/FPS
100%
Price, $
$90
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $90 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 82 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Oct 26th, 2010
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-380M | vs | Intel Core i7-920 |
---|---|---|
Oct 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Nov 17th, 2008 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Arrandale | Codename | Bloomfield |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 130 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |