Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms Core i3-380M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 3474 days newer than Core i3-380M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-380M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-10400F - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 6% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Core i3-380M - 234 vs 221 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-380M - 12 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
234
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.44/FPS
100%
Price, $
$101.85
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $101.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3201 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Oct 26th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-380M | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Oct 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Arrandale | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |