Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700 outperforms Core i3-380M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6700 is 1709 days newer than Core i3-380M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-380M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-6700 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700
- Performs up to 4% better in Dead Space than Core i3-380M - 150 vs 144 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-380M - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-380M doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
FPS
150
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.86/FPS
100%
Price, $
$129
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $129 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7562 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Oct 26th, 2010
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-380M | vs | Intel Core i7-6700 |
---|---|---|
Oct 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Jul 1st, 2015 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Arrandale | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |