Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 2200G outperforms Core i3-380M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 2200G is 2666 days newer than Core i3-380M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-380M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 2200G - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
- Performs up to 4% better in Rocket League than Core i3-380M - 696 vs 668 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-380M doesn't have integrated graphics
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
FPS
696
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.19/FPS
100%
Price, $
$130
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $130 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7630 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Mobile • Oct 26th, 2010
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-380M | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 2200G |
---|---|---|
Oct 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Arrandale | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |