Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 2700 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3250 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 2700 is 1775 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3250.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Up to 70% cheaper than Ryzen 7 2700 - $55.49 vs $185.0
- Up to 61% better value when playing F1 23 than Ryzen 7 2700 - $0.36 vs $0.93 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 2700 - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 2700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700
- Performs up to 29% better in F1 23 than Core i3-3250 - 198 vs 153 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3250 - 16 vs 4 threads
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
FPS
153
77%
Value, $/FPS
$0.36/FPS
100%
Price, $
$55.49
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $55.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 118 minutes ago
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 119 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3250 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700 |
---|---|---|
Jun 9th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |