Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 2700 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 2700 is 2054 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Up to 86% cheaper than Ryzen 7 2700 - $25.7 vs $185.0
- Up to 85% better value when playing Far Cry 3 than Ryzen 7 2700 - $0.21 vs $1.38 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 2700 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 2700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700
- Performs up to 11% better in Far Cry 3 than Core i3-3240T - 134 vs 121 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240T - 16 vs 4 threads
Far Cry 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
121
90%
Value, $/FPS
$0.21/FPS
100%
Price, $
$25.7
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $25.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18795 minutes ago
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18797 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3240T | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |