Key Differences
In short — FX-8350 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-8350 is 50 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Up to 86% cheaper than FX-8350 - $25.7 vs $182.02
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Performs up to 0% better in Minecraft than Core i3-3240T - 603 vs 600 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240T - 8 vs 4 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $25.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18 minutes ago
Buy for $182.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
447
91.59836065573771%
Multi-Core
971
48.67167919799499%
Intel Core i3-3240T | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |