Key Differences
In short — Core i3-3210 outperforms Core i3-3110M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-3210 is 214 days newer than Core i3-3110M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3210
- Performs up to 7% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i3-3110M - 243 vs 227 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3110M
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i3-3210 - 35 vs 55 Watts
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
FPS
243
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.29/FPS
100%
Price, $
$70
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 116 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3210 | vs | Intel Core i3-3110M |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket G2 (988B) |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
No | Overclockable | No |