Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms Core i3-3120M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 3383 days newer than Core i3-3120M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3120M
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 65% better in F1 23 than Core i3-3120M - 234 vs 142 FPS
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
234
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.32/FPS
100%
Price, $
$74.79
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $74.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 125 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Sep 30th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3120M | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 30th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |