Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10100 outperforms Core i3-3120M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10100 is 2769 days newer than Core i3-3120M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3120M
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i3-10100 - 35 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10100
- Performs up to 10% better in Overwatch 2 than Core i3-3120M - 349 vs 316 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3120M - 8 vs 4 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
349
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
100%
Price, $
$93.74
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $93.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6318 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Sep 30th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3120M | vs | Intel Core i3-10100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 30th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |