Key Differences
In short — FX-6100 outperforms Core i3-2367M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-6100 is 11 days newer than Core i3-2367M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2367M
- Consumes up to 82% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 17 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Performs up to 2% better in Elden Ring than Core i3-2367M - 110 vs 108 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-2367M - 6 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Mobile • Oct 1st, 2011
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-2367M | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
---|---|---|
Oct 1st, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
1.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |