Key Differences
In short — FX-8350 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-2120T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-2120T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing FX-8350 is 415 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-2120T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2120T
- Up to 68% cheaper than FX-8350 - $60.0 vs $185.0
- Up to 67% better value when playing Lost Ark than FX-8350 - $0.27 vs $0.83 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Performs up to 1% better in Lost Ark than Core i3-2120T - 224 vs 222 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-2120T - 8 vs 4 threads
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $60 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 123 minutes ago
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 123 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-2120T | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |