Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-2120T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-2120T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 3161 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-2120T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2120T
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - $60.0 vs $225.99
- Up to 65% better value when playing Rust than Core i7-10700F - $0.39 vs $1.11 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 33% better in Rust than Core i3-2120T - 204 vs 153 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-2120T - 16 vs 4 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $60 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4441 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
204
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.11/FPS
35%
Price, $
$225.99
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for $225.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4442 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-2120T | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |